Lawyer - Christopher Kerosky

 Home  | Submit your case to us  | Consul for Poland Polski |  Русский | English 
Political Asylum


 Christians From CIS Countries Often Entitled To Asylum.
  Non-Orthodox Christians such as Pentecostals, Baptists, Seventh Day Adventists and other denominations are widely unpopular throughout the former Soviet Union and often subject to persecution. Although it has become harder for them to obtain refugee status from the U.S. government in Russia., they can obtain asylum from the US Government here in the U.S.. Some persons who were denied refugee status in Russia may still apply for asylum once in the U.S. on the grounds that they have new evidence or facts supporting their application. These applications can be supported by documents from organizations such as Christian Concern, the Keston Institute, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International which have reported the unacceptable conditions for non-Orthodox Christians living in the former Soviet Union.
  To obtain asylum in the U.S., an applicant must prove a "well-founded fear of persecution" if they are returned to their home country. The Courts have said that "persecution" may include physical attacks, beatings, imprisonment, interrogation, loss of job and loss of housing, among other things.
  The Lautenberg Amendment, a statute passed by the U.S. Congress, states that Jews and Evangelical Christians from the former Soviet Union, shall be presumed to be eligible for asylum/refugee status. First enacted in 1989, the Lautenberg Amendment requires that the historical persecution of among other Soviet Jews, be considered when evaluating individual applications for refugee status. The Lautenberg Amendment can likewise be used to support asylum claims by Jews and Evangelical Christians here in the United States. Under this legislation, a category applicant may establish a well-founded fear of persecution by asserting a fear of persecution and asserting a credible basis for concern about such fear.
  In a recent case decided by one of the highest courts in the country, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Korablina v. INS, the federal appeals court defined persecution as "the infliction of suffering or harm upon those who differ (in race, religion, or political opinion) in a way regarded as offensive." In addition, "acts of violence against a petitioner's friends or family members may establish a well-founded fear of persecution." Persecution may be found by cumulative, specific instances of violence and harassment toward an individual and his family members, not only by the government, but also by a group the government declines to control.
  In Korablina, for example, the applicant testified that she witnessed repeated violent attacks and experienced one violent attack herself. She presented evidence of widespread harassment and violence by Ukrainian ultra-nationalists against religious minorities. In addition, she testified to having been robbed and attacked, tied to a chair with a noose around her neck and threatened with death. This incident resulted in medical treatment for shock and a concussion. She also testified that because she was not Orthodox she was refused admission to the university of her choice, encountered obstacles to career advancement, and finally lost her previous job when the department was taken over by an ultra-nationalist boss. Considering the totality of the evidence, the Court felt Korablina had met her prima facie case of persecution, entitling her to asylum and withholding of deportation.
  Our experience is that, in cases decided here in San Francisco and Northern California, persons who can document similar harassment and abuse on account of their Christian background can qualify for asylum.
  WARNING: The following is article discussing legal issues. It is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice. We recommend that you get competent legal advice specific to your case. If you would like such advice from our office, call (415) 777-4445 or (916) 349-2900 or (408) 993-9737.